Summary of Topics Discussed in this article on Real Estate Laws in Boerne and San Antonio:

Impact of Real Estate Commission Settlement on Industry Practices

  • Settlement Overview: The settlement has changed traditional real estate commission practices and laws in both Boerne and San Antonio. Previously, the seller paid commissions to both the listing and buyer’s agents.
  • Financial Implications: Now, sellers can choose not to offer a commission to the buyer’s agent, potentially reducing their costs and altering transaction dynamics.
  • Impact on Buyers: This shift places a financial burden on buyers, especially those inexperienced, who must now pay their agents or opt to proceed without one, potentially complicating transactions due to no intermediary.

Understanding Commission Structures: Pre-Change Overview

  • Traditional Structure: Commissions were split between the listing and buyer’s agents, typically totaling 5-6% of the home’s price, which encouraged agent collaboration to facilitate sales.
  • Seller’s Role: The seller would negotiate a listing commission that included paying the buyer’s agent, indirectly affecting the transaction’s cost to the buyer.
  • Transparency Issues: The traditional model obscured actual costs to buyers, who indirectly paid commissions through the purchase price.

The New Commission Settlement: What Changed?

  • Settlement Details: A class-action lawsuit led to significant changes, ending the obligation for sellers to automatically pay buyer’s agent commissions, thus aiming to lower transaction costs and increase transparency.
  • Direct Negotiations: The change allows for more direct negotiations on agent fees between buyers and sellers, impacting the overall dynamics and potentially leading to a more competitive market.
  • Buyer Responsibilities: Buyers now face a learning curve in understanding and negotiating agent fees, potentially increasing their transactional responsibilities.

Impact on Sellers and Listing Agents

  • Cost Savings: Sellers can save on commission costs, gaining more control over financial aspects of property sales.
  • Marketing Challenges for Agents: Listing agents must adapt to new conditions where they directly negotiate their fees, pushing for competitive rates and differentiated services.
  • Market Shifts: The market may see varied service models from agents and potentially faster shifts in property listing and sales strategies.

Impact on Buyers and Buyer Agents

  • Commission Costs to Buyers: Buyers might now pay commissions directly, affecting their overall cost calculations and agent interactions.
  • Agent Adjustments: Buyer agents need to justify their value more clearly, possibly shifting towards fee-for-service models to attract cost-conscious clients.
  • Market Dynamics: This could lead to a more buyer-focused market with varied agent service packages and increased competition among agents.

Navigating New Costs as a Home Buyer

  • Preparation for Upfront Costs: Buyers should anticipate significant upfront costs such as inspections and appraisals, influenced by the new commission structures.
  • Strategic Negotiations: It’s crucial for buyers to negotiate agent fees and consider various service types to manage costs effectively.
  • Financial Planning: Buyers should use financial planning tools to understand and manage additional expenses like title searches and insurance.

Legal Considerations and Advice

  • Legal Responsibilities: With the shift in commission payment responsibilities, buyers must understand their new contractual obligations.
  • Legal Risks Without Representation: Buyers without agents face higher risks in negotiations and contract understanding, necessitating legal advice.
  • Comprehensive Legal Planning: Buyers should consult legal professionals to integrate real estate purchases into broader financial and legal planning.


  • Market Transformation: The settlement reshapes U.S. residential real estate transactions, emphasizing transparency and flexibility in commission negotiations.
  • Adaptation and Opportunities: The industry must adapt to new norms, with all parties needing to stay informed and seek professional advice to navigate the changed landscape effectively.
  • Future Outlook: The market’s future dynamics will depend on how well participants adapt to these changes, impacting both buying and selling strategies.

Introduction: Impact of Real Estate Commission Settlement on Industry Practices

The recent settlement regarding the National Association of Realtor Commission has fundamentally altered the landscape of the real estate industry. This change in real estate law not only impacts Boerne and the San Antonio area, it has changed the landscape across the nation. Traditionally, the seller would pay commissions to both the listing and buyer’s agents. The typical arrangement would have the seller paying a total of approximately 5-6% in commissions, divided between these agents. This commission structure incentivized both parties to facilitate the sale. However, the settlement has now shifted this dynamic, allowing sellers to potentially bypass offering any commission to the buyer’s agent, which alters the financial and operational aspects of real estate transactions.

This change benefits sellers and listing agents by reducing the overall cost of selling a property, thereby potentially increasing net returns on sales. However, it places a new burden on buyers, particularly those who are first-time or less experienced, who must now either pay out of pocket for their representation or navigate the transaction without an agent. This could lead to a decrease in buyer’s agents in the market and possibly deter new buyers due to the increased upfront costs. The long-term effects of this shift may lead to more direct negotiations between buyers and sellers, possibly complicating transactions due to the lack of a mediator who understands the complexities of real estate deals.

Understanding Commission Structures: Pre-Change Overview

Prior to the recent regulatory changes, commission structures were a critical component of how transactions were financially managed between agents and their clients. Traditionally, these commissions were divided between the listing (seller’s) agent and the buyer’s agent, with common rates generally ranging from 5% to 6% of the home’s selling price. This fee was typically split equally between the two agents, each receiving about 2.5% to 3%. These commission rates were not fixed and could vary based on the agreement between the homeowner and the agents involved, reflecting the negotiable nature of real estate commissions.

The standard practice involved the seller agreeing to a listing commission with their agent, who then listed the property on the market. Part of the negotiation with the listing agent often included the commitment to pay the buyer’s agent’s commission. This structure incentivized buyer’s agents to show homes that offered a standard commission, thereby aligning the interests of buyers and agents. By ensuring that buyer’s agents were compensated, sellers could attract more potential buyers to their property, facilitating a smoother and potentially faster sale.

However, these traditional commission structures were set up in a way that potentially obscured the costs to the consumer. Buyers often did not directly pay their agents; instead, their agents received a share of the commission that the seller agreed to during the listing agreement. This arrangement made it somewhat unclear to the buyer how much of the property purchase price was effectively going towards agent commissions, thereby indirectly impacting the overall transaction cost.

This pre-change overview sets the stage for understanding the significant impact of the new regulations, which shift some financial responsibilities directly to buyers, altering how agents are compensated and potentially changing the dynamics of home buying and selling.

The New Commission Settlement: What Changed?

The recent landmark class-action lawsuit involving the National Association of Realtors (NAR) has led to significant changes in the way home-sale commissions are structured in the U.S. Traditionally, commissions were typically a combined total of 5-6% of the home’s selling price, split between the buyer’s and seller’s agents. This fee was generally borne by the seller, which not only increased the cost of selling a home but also indirectly affected the buying process. The settlement has shifted this paradigm by decoupling these commissions, allowing buyers and sellers more flexibility to negotiate agent fees directly.

Under the new agreement, which settles a hefty $418 million payout by NAR, the old system of obligatory commission payments to both buyer and seller agents by the seller is dismantled. This is intended to reduce overall transaction costs and increase transparency in real estate transactions. Sellers now have the option not to pay the buyer’s agent commission, which could potentially lower the seller’s expenses and alter the dynamics of negotiating home prices.

Experts believe this change will benefit consumers by lowering the cost of home sales and making fee structures more transparent. This could lead to a more competitive market, where buyers and sellers are better informed about the costs associated with buying or selling a home. However, it also places more responsibility on buyers to understand and negotiate the terms of agent fees, potentially leading to a new learning curve in the real estate process.

Overall, these changes are expected to have a profound impact on the real estate industry, promoting a more buyer-friendly environment that could encourage more transactions, especially among first-time homebuyers who are sensitive to the high costs associated with traditional commission structures.

Impact on Sellers and Listing Agents

The recent changes in real estate commission rules, notably the end of mandatory commission splits between listing and buyer’s agents, herald a significant shift for sellers and listing agents alike. Historically, sellers were responsible for paying both their own agents and the buyer’s agents, typically totaling around 5-6% of the home’s sale price. This cost is traditionally built into the price of the home, indirectly affecting the sale price and the seller’s net proceeds. The new rule change allows sellers to potentially save on these costs, offering more control over the financial aspects of selling their home. This could lead to a shift in the market where sellers might opt to negotiate lower commission rates or choose different models of service that could range from full service at a standard rate to more à la carte options, potentially making their listings more competitive.

For listing agents, these changes pose a new challenge in how they market their services and justify their fees. With the abolition of the standard offer of compensation via MLS, listing agents must now directly negotiate their fees with sellers who may be more incentivized to shop around for lower rates or different service models. This could drive a more competitive marketplace among agents, who will need to differentiate themselves through superior service, marketing techniques, or innovative pricing models. The change might also encourage more transparency in real estate transactions, as sellers become more involved in the negotiation details of agent commissions.

Ultimately, these changes are likely to impact how properties are listed and sold, influencing everything from listing prices to how quickly homes are sold. Sellers might lean towards agents who offer more competitive rates or who can demonstrate value through comprehensive marketing strategies or exceptional negotiation skills. As a result, the real estate market could see a diversification of service offerings, with more customized solutions tailored to the needs and financial goals of sellers [2], [6].

Impact on Buyers and Buyer Agents

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) settlement introduces significant changes affecting both buyers and buyer agents, fundamentally altering the traditional dynamics of real estate transactions. Previously, the commissions for buyer agents were typically covered by the seller, which was factored into the overall pricing of homes. This longstanding practice ensured that buyer agents were motivated to close deals but also subtly inflated home prices since sellers needed to cover these costs. The settlement dismantles this arrangement by allowing sellers to decide if they want to contribute to the buyer’s agent’s commission at all, which could lead to lower overall home prices but also less certainty of income for buyer agents.

For buyers, this change could mean either potential cost savings on the purchase price of a home or an additional expense if they choose to hire a buyer’s agent and must pay the commission themselves. This shift places greater responsibility on buyers to negotiate their agent’s fees and may encourage more to consider whether they need full-service representation or if other, less traditional service models might serve their needs just as well without the accompanying standard fees. It creates a buyer’s market where they can shop for agents based on cost-effectiveness and value offered rather than simply assuming the seller will cover these costs.

Buyer agents, in turn, may need to adjust their business models to accommodate these changes. They might need to be more transparent about their services and value proposition, possibly moving towards a fee-for-service model or reducing their rates to attract clients who are now more cost-conscious. This could spur innovation in the industry, with agents developing new types of service packages or marketing themselves directly to buyers as essential advisers in the home buying process, especially in complex negotiations or markets.

Overall, these changes are poised to reshape the landscape of real estate transactions, potentially making the process more competitive and buyer-focused, but also adding layers of complexity that both buyers and agents will need to navigate.

Navigating New Costs as a Home Buyer

In the current real estate market, navigating new costs as a home buyer has become increasingly complex, particularly with recent changes in commission structures. Home buyers should be prepared for various upfront expenses that significantly affect their overall budget. These costs typically range from 2% to 6% of the home’s purchase price and include fees for inspections, appraisals, and earnest money deposits, among others.

With the new commission changes, buyers now have the potential responsibility of paying their agent’s commission, which traditionally was covered by the seller. This shift can lead to additional out-of-pocket expenses for buyers, making it crucial for them to understand and negotiate these costs upfront. It’s advisable for buyers to shop around for agents and consider options such as limited service or ‘a la carte’ real estate services that may offer reduced fees. Effective negotiation strategies can help mitigate some of these new financial burdens.

Furthermore, first-time homebuyers should pay particular attention to understanding all the potential costs involved in purchasing a home. Beyond the down payment and mortgage, there are additional expenses such as title searches, homeowner’s insurance, and potential homeowners’ association fees. Educating oneself on these costs and how to strategically plan for them will ease the financial strain of the home buying process. Financial planning tools and resources, such as comprehensive guides available online, can provide valuable insights into managing these expenses effectively.

In summary, navigating the new costs of buying a home requires careful preparation and informed decision-making. Buyers should approach the process with a thorough understanding of all expenses, not just those associated with the mortgage but also the shifting responsibilities around agent commissions and other related costs.

Legal Considerations and Advice

In the realm of real estate, especially with the recent changes in commission structures, understanding the legal considerations is crucial for both buyers and sellers. There are critical legal aspects that homebuyers should be aware of, beginning with the legal responsibilities now placed on buyers to negotiate and possibly pay agent commissions. Given the shift away from seller-paid buyer agent commissions, it’s essential for buyers to have a clear understanding of their contractual obligations when engaging real estate agents. Legal advice should be sought to ensure contracts are transparent and fair, outlining who bears the cost of commissions and under what circumstances.

Further, buyers should be educated on the potential legal ramifications of real estate transactions, including the implications of not having a buyer’s agent. Without representation, buyers may find themselves at a disadvantage during negotiations or not fully understanding the legal paperwork, which could lead to costly mistakes. Legal advisors can provide crucial guidance on how to navigate these risks, particularly in states with specific disclosure requirements or where real estate laws heavily favor either the buyer or seller.

Additionally, this section would offer advice on integrating real estate transactions with broader aspects of legal and financial planning. For instance, understanding how the purchase of a home affects estate planning or the implications of real estate investments on personal tax obligations. It would be advisable for buyers to consult with legal professionals specializing in real estate, estate planning, or tax law to ensure that all aspects of a property purchase are managed prudently.

This comprehensive approach not only helps in making informed decisions but also in protecting one’s investments and legal rights in the complex landscape of real estate. As laws and market practices continue to evolve, staying updated through legal counsel is indispensable.


The recent settlement and resulting changes in real estate commission structures represent a seismic shift in the way residential real estate transactions are handled in the United States. These changes, driven by the desire to enhance transparency and fairness in the real estate market, effectively alter who bears the cost of commissions, offering more flexibility and potential cost savings for sellers while introducing new responsibilities for buyers. Such modifications are expected to foster a more competitive market environment where buyers and sellers have greater autonomy in choosing and negotiating with their real estate agents.

For buyers, while this might mean an additional cost burden should they opt to employ the services of a buyer’s agent, it also empowers them to negotiate more aggressively on commission rates. Conversely, sellers are likely to benefit from reduced costs associated with selling their homes, potentially making home selling more appealing. The overall impact of these changes will hinge on how market participants—buyers, sellers, and agents—adapt to the new norms.

As the real estate industry navigates these changes, the value of informed decision-making is heightened. Buyers and sellers are advised to seek out comprehensive, professional advice and to stay informed on the evolving legal landscape and market conditions. This approach will not only help mitigate the risks associated with these changes but also capitalize on the new opportunities they may bring. In conclusion, as the dust settles on this landmark change, the ability of market participants to adapt will dictate the future dynamics of the real estate industry.

*All information on this website or in the workshops is for educational purposes only and the information provided is general in nature. None of the information published on this website or used in the workshops are to be taken as specific legal advice. Use of this website or participation in a workshop does not create an attorney client relationship between you and the Escamilla Law Office. For legal advice, contact a licensed attorney in your state.